Saturday, December 8, 2018

Script for Presentation

Hello, My name is Katie Whelan and today I am going to be analyzing Alexander Graham bells invention, which is the telephone.

What is is? 20
It is a modified version of a telegraph. A telegraph is a system for transmitting messages from a distance, along a wire. Bell’s patented telephone design is similar to the telegraph but instead transmits sound. 

At first glance can you tell what it is?20

Honestly, no. At first glance I thought it was something you look through and was possible an early invention of the camera. It does not resemble the telephones or mobile you see everywhere nowadays. The design, style and technology of the telephone have changed dramatically over the years. So much that is was surprising to find out that this was the look and design of first telephone invented. 


What is the technology?20  1min

The telephone consists of two main parts, the transmitter and receiver. The transmitter and receiver each contain a diaphragm, which is a round metal disk. During a phone call, the sound waves of the callers voice cause the diaphragm in the transmitter to vibrate. This motion is transferred along the phone line to the receiver. The receiving diaphragm vibrates according to the speaker’s speech pattern and produces the sound waves that were sent into the transmitter.

Is it new technology? 20

It is a modified version of the telegraph. The purpose of the harmonic telegraph was to transmit several messages over a single telegraph wire at the same time without interference. The main difference was that Bell’s telephone could transmit sound. 

What is it made of?20
The telephone consists of:
Transmitter
Receiver,
Single microphone,
Stationary speaking tube
Wires,
Ranged from glass, ceramics, paper, metals, rubber and plastic

What about it’s style?20   2mins
It is clear that the function and how the person would use the telephone was the main inspiration for the style and look of the phone.  Thomas Edison introduced a model that had a moveable listening earpiece and a stationary speaking tube.
Is it necessary for the technology to take this shape and form?20

No. The evolution of the design of the telephone has transformed over the years and this proves how the shape and form can differ from the original telephone design. As long as there is enough distance between the receiver and transmitter so that the user can hear the caller through the receiver and still be able to talk into the transmitter then it will work successfully. 


What other things could influence the style of the object?20
The main factor that would influence the style would be the user. Age and disabilities would change the style of the phone. For example telephones for the blind and hearing impaired have been created. With the new smart phones you could go hands free and command the virtual assistant to call people, send msg and so on. There are phones with larger buttons and text for older generations. 

Who is the maker of the object?20   3mins

Alexander Graham Bells patent, for his invention of the telephone, was issued on March 7, 1876 by the US patent office. Nowadays there are many companies that create phones such as Apple, Samsung, Nokia, Google, blackberry and so on. 

How was the object invented? 20

Alexander graham bell was in the city of Brantford, Ontario, Canada where he was working on a harmonic telegraph with Watson. A reed struck on Watson’s transmitter and an intermittent current was converted to a continuous current. Bell was able to hear sound on his receiver. This confirmed his belief that sound, could be transmitted and reconverted through an eclectic wire using a continuous electric current. 

What does the object tell you about the person who made it?  20

The object reveals that the creator expressed an interest in speech, hearing and communication. Furthermore this object shows that they were interested in the development of the communication technology at the time. This object allows the user to communicate with another human at a distance. 


How is the object used? 20   4mins

The main function of the telephone is to communicate with another person at a distance. In today’s society, phones have many functions such as researching content online, play music, games, videos and communicating with others. People can text, call, email, send a Snapchat or tweet someone. Society has become accustomed to this distance and uses the phone for their main way of communicating with others. 

 Who are the stakeholders? 20
Gardiner Hubbard and Thomas Sanders funded Bell’s invention. Hubbard saw great promise in the harmonic telegraph and backed Bell’s experiments. He agreed that Bell could develop his telephone concept as long as he devoted most of his time to the harmonic telegraph. 
Additionally another main stakeholder is the customer because they have influence over the style, design, function, and features of the telephone. 


In what way is the object valuable? 20
The telephone is considered valuable because it allows communication at a great distance. At the time the telegraph and letters were the main sources for communicating at a distance. With the development of the technology, people could communicate to someone in another town or location.  

Has the object changed in relation to any stakeholder? 20    5mins
Ye,s since the first telephone was created, the customers and competitors have grown. With the growth and development of technology, this product is in demand. The customers and competitors have an influence over the design and technology of the telephone. There are more competitors, which put pressure on phone companies to develop something new for the phone.

The latest phones have virtual assistants, facial recognition, cameras built in and so much more. It’s like a mini computer that fits in your hand. 


Does it have monetary value? 20
According the the Independent.co . UK, The number of active mobile devices is around 7.22 billion. That means there are more phones than people in the world. With phone companies producing new models there is a high revenue income because the phone is in demand. People want the latest technology and are willing to pay a high price for it. 

Cultural context

How the telephone has changed society? 20

The telephone has shaped the way we communicate with one another. With the use of phones you can communicate with another person at a distance. However as a society we have become dependent on the phone and use it as a barrier from other people. We rather communicate through a screen then talk face to face. 

We are alone together 20 6mins
If you look at a group of people at the bus stop or in pub or even look at a group of friends, you are guaranteed to see some of them on their phones. We are slowly loosing our ability to talk to one another and have become socially awkward. We can’t go more than a few minutes without checking our phones. 

Conversation happens in real time 20 
With texting you can control what you want to say and when you want to say it. Furthermore you can edit it and maybe even deleted it. Conversations happen in real-time. There is no editing or deleting and maybe that’s why we fear communicating face to face. 



Filtering conversations 20

As a society we have this need to filter everything. We Photoshop images, manipulate voice recordings and edited what we text until we are satisfied with it. Because of phones we have   this desire to filter how we communicate with one another. We need to learn that you can’t filter real life or real life conversations. 

Future of the telephone 20  7mins
There is no doubt that the technology of the telephone will continue to grow. Younger generations are introduced to phones from as young as baby's because it is used as a distraction. All we can do now is watch our screen to see how we are slowly loosing the ability to communicate with one another. 

What is the style of the object?


It is clear that the function and how the person would use the telephone was the main inspiration for the style and look of the phone.  Thomas Edison introduced a model that had a moveable listening earpiece and a stationary speaking tube.
Is it necessary for the technology to take this shape and form?

No. The evolution of the design of the telephone has transformed over the years and this proves how the shape and form can differ from the original telephone design. As long as there is enough distance between the receiver and transmitter so that the user can hear the caller through the receiver and still be able to talk into the transmitter then it will work successfully. 


What other things could influence the style of the object?
The main factor that would influence the style would be the user. Age and disabilities would change the style of the phone. For example telephones for the blind and hearing impaired have been created. With the new smart phones you could go hands free and command the virtual assistant to call people, send msg and so on. There are phones with larger buttons and text for older generations. 

What does the object tell you about the person who made it?

The object reveals that the creator expressed an interest in speech, hearing and communication. Furthermore this object shows that they were interested in the development of the communication technology at the time. This object allows the user to communicate with another human at a distance. 

Has the object changed in relation to any stakeholders, or have the stakeholders changed in relation to the object?

Since the invention of the first telephone the phone has changed dramatically.

There are many telephone operating companies today.

Here are just a few of the top companies with the highest revenue:

  • AT&T
  • Desutsche Telekom
  • Vodafone
  • Orange
  • Telekom Italia
  • China Telekom
  • 3
  • Megafon
  • and so on.  




Here are a few brands that make phones:


  • Apple
  • Samsung
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • Asus
  • Google
  • Blackberry
  • and so on


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_telephone_operating_companies

Each company has their own stakeholders. I believe the object has changed because of the amount of competitors. Each company are trying to match what their competitors have and have an extra feature. The teleology of the phone is constantly being developed.



There is always a comparison between phone brands and features. It's a constant competition.

https://www.crn.com/slide-shows/mobility/head-to-head-apple-iphone-xs-vs-samsung-galaxy-s9/2



What does the object reveal about stakeholders values, beliefs and habits?

"When Bell mentioned to Gardiner Hubbard and Thomas Sanders that he was working on a method of sending multiple tones on a telegraph wire using a multi-reed device, the two wealthy patrons began to financially support Bell's experiments."



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Graham_Bell



"Hubbard saw great promise in the harmonic telegraph and backed Bell’s experiments. Bell, however, was more interested in transmitting the human voice. Finally, he and Hubbard worked out an agreement that Bell would devote most of his time to the harmonic telegraph but would continue developing his telephone concept."
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alexander-Graham-Bell


I believe when Hubbard and Sanders invested in Bell's invention they believed this was the next step in the telegraph technology. They could see how a harmonic telegraph would be valuable and it was literally a race to see who could achieve creating a device like this. I imagine they valued the development and evolution of this technology.

Even modern times it's always about the next step in technology. What will be the next feature in telephones.

Consider the view of all the stakeholders and the relationship between each stakeholder and object

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Graham_Bell

Who were the stakeholders?

Bell mentioned to Gardiner Hubbard and Thomas Sanders that he was working on a method of sending multiple tones on a telegraph wire using a multi-reed device, the two wealthy patrons began to financially support Bell's experiments.[76] Patent matters would be handled by Hubbard's patent attorneyAnthony Pollok.[77]
77-The Telephone Patent Conspiracy of 1876

"With financial support from Sanders and Hubbard, Bell hired Thomas Watson as his assistant,[N 14] and the two of them experimented with acoustic telegraphy"."On June 2, 1875, Watson accidentally plucked one of the reeds and Bell, at the receiving end of the wire, heard the overtones of the reed; overtones that would be necessary for transmitting speech. That demonstrated to Bell that only one reed or armature was necessary, not multiple reeds"

"Bell's patent 174,465, was issued to Bell on March 7, 1876, by the U.S. Patent Office.
 He had agreed to share U.S. profits with his investors Gardiner Hubbard and Thomas Sanders."

The relationship between the stakeholder and the object

Thomas Sanders and Gardiner Hubbard funded Alexander Bell's invention. Because of the financial support that led Bell to hire an assistant. This resulted in the accidental discovery which led to the creation of the first telephone. 

Saturday, December 1, 2018

Is it a completely new kind of tech, or and improvement on older tech?

When Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone he was working on a harmonic telegraph. The primary difference between the harmonic telegraph and Bell's telephone is that it could transmit sound. The purpose of the harmonic telegraph was to make it possible to transmit several messages over a single telegraph wire at the same time without interference.


https://www.americanheritage.com/content/voice-heard-round-world

Since then the telephone has evolved and we now have a portable mobile that has many functions. It's like a mini computer that fits in your pocket. We can take calls from the other side of the world. Send emails and letters to people around the world and more. The technology has improved dramatically since the first telephone but we are always searched for the next new phone that has the latest technology . The newest iPhone has facial recognition to unlock your phone. We can FaceTime people and talk to their face through the screen. We are putting a barrier between each other when communicating with one another.